How We Share Code and Types Between Your Web App and Mobile App
Studio Team · Web & Product Studio · 21 April 2026
Most products eventually need three things: a mobile app, a web app, and a backend feeding both. The traditional route is three technologies, three codebases and effectively three teams, with every feature implemented twice and every change coordinated across all of them. We build all three in one language.
talk about your productWHAT'S INCLUDED
Front-end, mobile, backend and testing, by one team rather than three.
Web in Next.js, mobile in React Native, backend in Nest.js, all TypeScript, in a single repository with shared packages between them. There is exactly one definition of what a Product, an Order or a User is, and all three import it. When the backend changes a field, the web and mobile code that depends on it fails to compile immediately, with a precise list of every affected spot.
In practice 30–50% of the code is shared, and it is precisely the part where bugs are most expensive: the data definitions, the rules, the calculations. The screens stay separate, because a good mobile interface and a good web interface are genuinely different.
Often not, and any agency that recommends one on every project is optimising for its invoice rather than your runway.
If your app mostly stores and displays data and the rules are simple, a managed backend like Firebase or Supabase is the right call. It saves a real share of the build and one to two weeks of timeline. If your product matches, calculates, pays out, approves or integrates with other systems, plan for a custom backend from day one.
We also inherit codebases: apps built by a previous team, products that have outgrown a managed backend, front-ends that need rebuilding without rewriting everything behind them. Migrating from Firebase to a custom backend is a normal, plannable project rather than a rewrite of your app.
Yes, and that is why we build in React Native: one codebase running natively on both, which is meaningfully cheaper and faster than building the same product twice.
Yes. We start with a short review of what is there and what it would cost to keep versus replace, and you get that assessment before committing to anything further.
If your app stores and displays data with simple rules, Firebase or Supabase is genuinely enough and saves both money and time. If it matches, calculates, pays out, approves or integrates, plan for a custom backend. If you are unsure, start managed and treat migration as a milestone rather than an emergency.
PostgreSQL most often, plus MySQL and MongoDB, accessed through Prisma, TypeORM or Mongoose depending on what the project needs.
We do: functional, cross-platform, accessibility, performance and automated testing, on real devices old and new, on both platforms, not only simulators.
RELATED WORK
FLEET MANAGEMENT
Bookings, fleet, contracts, invoicing and analytics in one workspace, plus the booking site customers use and the mobile app the branch runs on.
DOCUMENT WORKFLOW
An approval and digitalization platform configurable enough to match each client's internal process, with OCR doing the typing and the audit trail keeping score.
RELATED READING
Studio Team · Web & Product Studio · 21 April 2026
Studio Team · Web & Product Studio · 24 March 2026
OTHER SERVICES